Lucifer is NOT Evil / Satan!

Lucifer is described to be the greatest of all gods creations which means the only being he comes second to is likely god. Lucifer is god's favorite and the most beautiful angel.

He allegedly tried to take over heaven, apparently was the result of pride, jealousy, and discontent. But lets be honest, Lucifer was doing this as no doubt he disagreed with how his father was running things. Many beings can relate to him because most of the time parents don't agree with children if they try to correct them. As well as one-third of all the angels left god for the sake of following Lucifer.

Now ask yourself, someone as powerful as god, losing followers to someone less powerful. Who do you think is right in that situation? Because normally when you can chose between the most powerful being and the second most powerful, you go with the most powerful. Unless the most powerful is that unlikable in which case you go with the underdog. My point being, maybe Lucifer was onto something. Again I point out that God made Lucifer better than everything. Maybe Lucifer was made a little too well made. And because of that he was able to see right through God.

After all it wasn't Lucifer who was responsible for the whole Noah's ark incident. It was god who committed genocide against the entire planet with the exception of a few human beings and a small group of animals. How can you not agree with Lucifer at this point? Because based on that you can see where God made a horrible mistake. Lucifer has not to this day committed such a massive genocide against the human race. God also has ridiculous laws like if you eat from the tree of knowledge I will kill you. What kind of saying is that?

They say Lucifer uses every conceivable way to deceive and destroy people. But that doesn't seem likely to me. What it appears is someone out of all the angels was willing to stand up and say God I don't really agree with you. And as a result God did everything he could to slander this angel to make himself look good, and this angel look like evil. All for the sake of continuing his following and have human beings like you worship him. I mean what happened when Lucifer disagreed with him? That's right, he got kicked out of heaven, just like when you disagree with your parents, they will kick you out of their house.

My point is that Lucifer isn't evil most people think of him as. He just disagreed with the most powerful being. And in return that being kicked Lucifer out of his home and into everlasting torcher where he always is getting burned.


Re-posted from FB group World Ancient History >>

Lucifer, the Light beacon

Helena P. Blavatsky, the founder of nowadays well established Theosophy, shares these thoughts about the Lucifer:



“Esoteric philosophy admits neither good nor evil per se, as existing independently in nature. The cause for both is found, as regards the Kosmos [Cosmos], in the necessity of contraries or contrasts, and with respect to man, in his human nature, his ignorance and passions. There is no devil or the utterly depraved, as there are no Angels absolutely perfect, though there may be spirits of Light and of Darkness; thus LUCIFER – the spirit of Intellectual Enlightenment and Freedom of Thought – is metaphorically the guiding beacon, which helps man to find his way through the rocks and sandbanks of Life, for Lucifer is the LOGOS in his highest, and the “Adversary” in his lowest aspect – both of which are reflected in our Ego.” (Vol. 2, p. 162)


 “In antiquity and reality, Lucifer, or Luciferus, is the name of the angelic Entity presiding over the light of truth as over the light of the day. In the great Valentinian gospel Pistis Sophia it is taught that of the three Powers emanating from the Holy names of the Three Tριδυνάμεις, that of Sophia (the Holy Ghost according to these Gnostics – the most cultured of all) resides in the planet Venus or Lucifer.”
(Vol. 2, p. 512)


 “It is but natural – even from the dead letter standpoint – to view Satan, the Serpent of Genesis, as the real creator and benefactor, the Father of Spiritual mankind. For it is he who was the “Harbinger of Light,” bright radiant Lucifer, who opened the eyes of the automaton created by Jehovah, as alleged; and he who was the first to whisper: “in the day ye eat thereof ye shall be as Elohim, knowing good and evil” – can only be regarded in the light of a Savior. An “adversary” to Jehovah the “personating spirit,” he still remains in esoteric truth the ever-loving “Messenger” (the angel), the Seraphim and Cherubim who both knew well, and loved still more, and who conferred on us spiritual, instead of physical immortality – the latter a kind of static immortality that would have transformed man into an undying “Wandering Jew”.”
(Vol. 2, p. 243)


“The Fall was the result of man’s knowledge, for his “eyes were opened.” Indeed, he was taught Wisdom and the hidden knowledge by the “Fallen Angel,” for the latter had become from that day his Manas, Mind and Self-consciousness. In each of us that golden thread of continuous life – periodically broken into active and passive cycles of sensuous existence on Earth, and super-sensuous in Devachan – is from the beginning of our appearance upon this earth. It is the Sutratma, the luminous thread of immortal impersonal monadship, on which our earthly lives or evanescent Egos are strung as so many beads – according to the beautiful expression of Vedantic philosophy.”

 “And now it stands proven that Satan, or the Red Fiery Dragon, the “Lord of Phosphorus” (brimstone was a theological improvement), and Lucifer, or “Light-Bearer,” is in us: it is our Mind – our tempter and Redeemer, our intelligent liberator and Savior from pure animalism. Without this principle – the emanation of the very essence of the pure divine principle Mahat (Intelligence), which radiates direct from the Divine mind – we would be surely no better than animals.” (Vol. 2, p. 513)

Source:
http://blavatskytheosophy.com/lucifer-the-lightbringer/

Light in the Dark

First blog on our new website! Welcome!

I'd like to share what this aspect of my work, the LVX Ferre (Ars Heosphoros) website, is all about. What follows is my subjective view about what the Left-hand Path is and is not.

I will employ a bit of deconstructive criticism.


Growing up and waking up

There are many, many paths and the Left-Hand Path (LHP) is generally understood to deal with the dark aspects of existence.

Just like the Right-Hand Path might have its star followers (law-abiding, rules-following, God-fearing, avoiding sin out of fear, kind and polite out of duty, maintaining celibacy -- basically denying full inner freedom and power), so does the LHP:
45 years old adolescents who still rebel against any system, angry and hurt men who believe Satan is their angry God and vengeance will soon be at hand, sad women who were perhaps mistreated from day one and now (unaware) swear by the darkest of demons but in truth, all they want is to be noticed and loved, etc.

Nothing of the above has got anything to do with the LHP as I perceive it, for, generally speaking, two processes are going on in any given human life: 

- growing up (personal development) and 

- waking up (spiritual awakening).

The above cases are maybe ripe for a quality humanistic psychotherapy session, not LHP and Dark arts, in my opinion.

Why humanistic? Because individualization and self-actualization (meaning, growing up and becoming a responsible, healthy, and happy person without childish games of pointing fingers and rebelling or screaming for attention) is the goal of the humanistic approach. And humanistic psychology deals with the personal aspects of human awareness: nothing spiritual or transcendental or even remotely Dark there.

One has to learn to walk (by growing up) first before one can fly in the sky of spiritual awakening.


LHP drama 

Yes, many might join our ranks motivated by anger, pain, despair, and maybe find comfort in the company of other hurt and lonely people, probably desperately swearing their eternal allegiance to the "Dark and Wrathful Horned God" with little or no empirical knowledge of him whatsoever.

Engaging in the LHP can be, and indeed in many cases is, only a drama and a substitute for real-life; oftentimes the LHP club is merely a runaway strategy from deeper and mostly fucked up inner reality.

Is anything wrong with that? Nope.

So, what am I saying? That one has to be healed first to take the medicine? Nope.


Fire from within

To drive the points I'd love to make in this article right in, let us read this beautiful and touching poem (emphasis mine):


The Luciferian Witch

This religion is not your calling
Your insurrection is not a falling.
Seek culmination beyond the herd,
Your cultivation is self-conferred.
Azazel wants not your service,
Let not his presence make you nervous.
Satan is not our dark lord,
Nor a devil to be abhorred.
Not a source of quick reward,
But an arcane force to be explored.
Do not pray to Lucifer,
For that is not what He’d prefer.
Look inside to see the truth,
The black flame burns away uncouth.
Do not follow the path that is graveled,
But follow the one that is less traveled.
Find the demons deep therein,
Hail thyself!
Your power is within.

- Poem by John M Penkal, author of Truly Satanic vol 1. book.


 LHP is only a process

My point is that LHP is so, so much more than seeking solutions on the outside, angry rebelling, naively bowing to some leader of a "dark coven" and playing the role of a dark one, for the goal of LHP is the same as that of most other paths:
freedom, self-respect, love, liberty, strength, health, liberating spiritual insight, wisdom, and pure joy!

Dealing with inner personal shadow and working with "dark" spirits is not the point of the LHP in and by itself - it is JUST a path, a process, nothing more.

Granted, it is a path or process that can be quite challenging and even dangerous simply because it takes more dedication, sincerity, openness, common sense, and wisdom to even walk the path, let alone master it, but it is still only a process and only a path.

And a lot of LHP followers confuse the two: the goal and the path, meaning that many take darkness as the goal instead of only as a path. It gets really, really dark if one does that.

True answers, long-lasting solutions to the human thirst for happiness can not be given from the outside, not even by Lucifer or Satan, as the lovely poem above so clearly points out.

What do you think/feel?


Darkness is not the goal

And so, the LVX Ferre (Ars Heosphoros) website and this aspect of my work are about our inner potential, inner journey through Darkness to the Light, and beyond them both. It is not about the drama around the darkness and "dark paths". Other websites deal with that effectively and profitably, it seems.

LVX Ferre is about the road less traveled: it is about the goal of the LHP which leads beyond Light and Darkness, and which de facto fortifies and indeed actualizes personal and transpersonal responsibility and freedom of serious adepts.

It is about employing the Dark side of existence to make things more real, more down-to-earth, more up close and personal, moving from head/mind to the heart/soul.

'All in' is the motto around here; all in, meaning embracing everything and denying nothing without attaching oneself to the process, regardless.

Ἑωσφόρος Νύξ

You might also want to see Dark in the Light, here >>